A problem in workplaces is appearing due to a misinterpretation of a recent ruling by the Supreme Court that indicated that fixed bonuses at a certain company should be included in ordinary wage calculation. Some trade unions are demanding that fixed bonuses be included, and a push for this seems to be gradually spreading. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling was about one specific company, and application to all companies is not appropriate. Possible rulings on similar cases in the future may result in other allowances such as payment for overtime, night, and weekend work being calculated as ordinary wages, resulting in an enormous increase of the financial burden on companies.
Labor cost would increase if the scope of wages included in ordinary wage calculation is extended
Allowances and bonuses, as defined under the Labor Standards Act, are determined based on ordinary wages. Therefore, increasing ordinary wages puts a greater burden on companies by increasing the cost of labor. Of particular note, increasing ordinary wages through inclusion of fixed bonuses also increases other related allowances such as payment for overtime, night shift, and weekend work. This will also increase indirect costs, such as payments upon retirement and premiums for the 4 social insurances, by increasing total and average wages.
Business measures
The Supreme Court ruling is only for a certain company in particular circumstances, and cannot be applied to all companies. If the ruling is applied as a general case, companies should prepare for an extra burden by reconstructing their wage systems.
< Table 1 > Comparison of law, administrative interpretation, and judicial precedent regarding ordinary wage
※ Please contact the KEF Legal Affairs Team (Tel: 02-3270-7327, 7361) if you have any questions or problems regarding the issues described above.
|